We protect people and the businesses they run.™
J. J. Keller company logo

0 Items

Safety & Compliance Resources

J. J. Keller protects people and the businesses they run. You can trust our expertise across a wide range of subjects relating to labor, transportation, environmental, and worker safety. Our deep knowledge of federal and state agencies is built on a strong foundation of more than 100 editors and consultants and 70+ years of regulatory compliance experience.

Company & Careers

J. J. Keller protects people and the businesses they run. You can trust our expertise across a wide range of subjects relating to labor, transportation, environmental, and worker safety. Our deep knowledge of federal and state agencies is built on a strong foundation of more than 100 editors and consultants and 70+ years of regulatory compliance experience.

Case — “No more free rides” for employee on leave for cancer

November 2, 2022

From January 2002 to August 2018, Jeffrey worked as a director of business development for a large construction company. In 2014, he was diagnosed with a rare bone cancer that required treatment and leave from April 2014 until May 1, 2015. Part of that leave was protected by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the rest was a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Jeffrey returned to work with continued accommodations, including flexibility to attend medical appointments.

In 2017, a second director of business development was hired. That same year, Jeffrey took FMLA leave from September 8, through November 15. Michael expressed frustration at the fact that Jeffrey’s leave was disrupting the company’s business.

On April 15, 2018, Jeffrey again took FMLA leave, with an anticipated return date of June 18.

Jeffrey told Michael, however, that he might need more FMLA leave again in September. In discussing this with Robert, the company’s HR director, Michael said “the bottom line was I told him it’s time to produce — there are no more free rides anymore.”

On August 13, Michael, Robert, and others met with Jeffrey to discuss his termination. Michael said his position was being eliminated, since they didn’t need two business development people. Jeffrey sued the company, Michael, and Robert, for FMLA retaliation.

The court indicated that a juror could find that the discussions of Jeffrey’s indication of the need for more leave and the timing of the termination, along with the perception that he was being given a “free ride” point to retaliation.

Therefore, the company and the individuals named in the claim will need to continue to defend their actions.

Seigel v. Structure Tone Organization et al., Southern District of New York, No. 7:19-cv-07307, October 24, 2022.

Key to remember: Making disparaging statements about an employee’s taking FMLA leave seldom looks good in a court, particularly when the employee is terminated shortly after those remarks are made. Supervisor and manager training can help avoid such issues.


Publish Date

November 2, 2022

Author

Darlene Clabault

Type

Industry News

Industries

{not populated}

Related Topics

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)

Governing Bodies

Wage and Hour Division (WHD), DOL

Citations

{not populated}