Outsourcing FMLA leave management doesn’t outsource employer liability

May 20, 2026

In early 2023, Rodney began taking intermittent leave for two separate reasons under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA): to care for his mother and for his own condition. The company approved both of his leaves through the beginning of August.

In July, the employer outsourced its FMLA claim management to a third-party administrator (TPA).

Subsequently, Rodney tried to report his absences as FMLA leave to the TPA but had major difficulties. He called the TPA several times, but the phone line often left him on hold or disconnected the call. In fact, if people were still on hold at 5 p.m., the TPA hung up. Rodney tried to use the TPA’s website and automated service but found those methods ineffective, as well.

Timothy, Rodney’s supervisor, assured him that as long as his FMLA paperwork was completed correctly, he wouldn’t be penalized if the TPA’s system didn’t work properly. Therefore, Rodney texted Timothy to report his absences.

In October, Timothy told Rodney that he had accrued 54 attendance points; that Rodney hadn’t reported absences to the TPA as FMLA leave. In response, Rodney reported any absences he believed were FMLA-related to the TPA for possible approval.

About a week later, Rodney met with a company HR representative to talk about his issues getting FMLA approval for his absences. The representative assured Rodney that she would handle it, telling him not to worry.

Termination and lawsuit

In January 2024, Rodney was surprised to receive a letter from the employer firing him for “excessive absenteeism, providing false, dishonest, or misleading information in connection with a request for leave, and failure to follow the notification procedure for leave time.”

Rodney sued, arguing that the employer denied his FMLA rights and that he never received proper notice from the TPA. He also claimed that the significant problems with the TPA’s system discouraged him from taking FMLA leave because he believed it wouldn’t be recorded correctly, and that he wouldn’t be able to speak with anyone at the TPA.

The employer argued that it gave Rodney FMLA benefits for all dates for which he provided a complete FMLA certification. The employer also claimed that the TPA sent letters to Rodney regarding his certifications, but Rodney claimed he never received the letters.

Court ruling

The court ruled in favor of Rodney, stating that a reasonable jury could find that the TPA’s system created a “burdensome approval process” that interfered with or discouraged Rodney from taking FMLA leave. The court also took issue with the fact that the HR department saw discrepancies with Rodney’s leave, but never discussed them with him before his termination.

Severson v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., Eastern District of Wisconsin, No. 24-CV-1063, April 27, 2026.

Key to remember: Employers are responsible for ensuring that they or their TPA doesn’t make the FMLA process overly burdensome for employees.


Publish Date

May 20, 2026

Author

Darlene Clabault

Type

Industry News

Industries

{not populated}

Related Topics

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)

Leave

Governing Bodies

{not populated}

Citations

{not populated}